home  |  book  |

Biography Conservatives and the Creative Impulse: Part I

print view

The Race To Unimportance

by Christopher Chantrill
March 10, 2005 at 10:34 am

|

EVERYBODY now knows that President Larry Summers of Harvard, leader of an institution devoted both to truth and phonics (VE-RI-TAS), is in serious trouble for pursuing truth.  It is a situation beyond parody.  But inquiring minds are bound to wonder what is really behind all the sound and fury.  Suppose the attack on Summers were not just a power play by leading women in science?  It could have deep philosophical significance.

As sophisticated American Thinkers we should not eliminate the most likely possibility: mindless liberal wreckers at work.  Liberals have already wrecked K-12 education, and they have wrecked the little platoons of civil society with their welfare state.  They wrecked the working class, turning it into the underclass.  They are doing their darndest to wreck the nuclear “heteronormative” family.  Why not wreck the university, too? 

But why should liberal women want to wreck Harvard over the issue of jobs for women in science?  As usual, Jane Austen has the answer.  Her heroines Fanny Price (of Mansfield Park) and Anne Elliott (of Persuasion) can tell us what is going down at Harvard. 

Reviled and ignored by their snobbish families, Jane Austen’s two “good-girl” heroines seem to be superfluous; they are women of no consequence.  In Fanny Price and Anne Elliott, according to C.S. Lewis, the “consciousness of mattering which is necessary even to the humblest woman is denied.”  Men, we know, are expendable, but women, even the humblest, are important: they matter.  Fortunately, the compassionate Jane Austen rescues her heroines from the denial of mattering in a traditional novelistic dénouement.  Perhaps the distinguished scientific women of Harvard are telling us that they are afraid they don’t matter.

A century ago, science was simple.  Ten thousand eager young male German physicists (ok, twenty) were pondering over the problem of the speed of light.  No doubt every one of them was brilliant and deserving.  But one day one of them solved the problem, and the rest are forgotten.  Nobody cares.  Why should they?  But imagine now ten thousand female American scientists at this very moment working in university research laboratories all across America to solve spinal injuries using embryonic stem cells.  If some man solves the enigma tomorrow and becomes the toast of Democrats everywhere, what will happen to all those worthy female scientists?  Will they be reduced to doing research on adult stem cells?  Should they go back to nursing?   Might they become homemakers?  They cannot just be ignored.  They are women.  They matter, as Larry Summers now agrees.  

Women matter for a simple reason.  We need them to make children.  Historically, men have been peripheral to this activity, as biogenetic researchers recently discovered. Down the ages, only about half of the men in each generation have succeeded in inserting their genes into the next generation, whereas almost all women have succeeded in this endeavor.  In compensation, men have focused their interest on less important activities, like making war and making science.  The recent entry of women into historically less important activities like science is therefore important.  It implies that the generation problem has at last been solved.  What matters now is not the generation of children, but the generation of science.

Now that science has become necessary the men that once dominated the academy are deserting it for less important activities.  Whereas a century ago the vast majority of college graduates were men, today only about 40 percent of each graduating cohort is male and even that proportion is expected to decline.

In fact, males seem to be going off education altogether.  They are becoming so inattentive that up to 17 percent of boys ( go ahead, pick your favorite number) are now being drugged in the government’s public schools in order to keep their “bums on seats,” as the British say, and their minds focused “on task.”

We know why boys are going off education.  They have less important things to do.  They are engrossed in the current Big Thing: video games.  All across America, at this very minute, millions of teenage boys have their bums on seats in front of their Xboxes playing the first person shooter game Halo 2.  It’s an international phenomenon, of course.  One all-American boy recently discovered that the Halo shooters around him were all speaking German. 

On weekends, American kids are getting their fathers to take them into the office so they can play Halo 2 using big screen conference room monitors. 

There are those that worry about this race to unimportance.  They worry that the generation problem has not been solved, for modern women have shown such distaste for generation that population decline is now inevitable, at least in Old Europe.

But however hard they try, women will never be as unimportant as men.  Whether they like it or not, women matter.  Even women of science.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS

Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois

Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990

Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing

Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit

Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008

presented by Christopher Chantrill

 •  Contact