home  |  book  |

Government and Failure Education for What?

print view

A "New Model School" Opens in London

by Christopher Chantrill
October 03, 2004 at 3:00 am

|

BACK IN THE nineteenth century, before the educated elite had taken an interest in education, ordinary people paid to send their children to school.  In England they paid 3d or 6d per week (i.e. about 25 cents in nineteenth century US dollars) at the most basic schools.  The result was that by 1870 when the state decided to take over child education to “fill in the gaps” the literacy rate in England was about 90 percent.  Now, of course, things are much better, for only about 30 percent of the graduates of England’s “bog standard” comprehensive schools remain functionally illiterate, according to social commentator Theodore Dalrymple. 

In England, as in the United States, some souls have dared to wonder whether a one-size-fits-all government monopoly is the best way to educate children.  They wonder whether a million parents making individual decisions about the education of their children might outperform thousands of education bureaucrats and experts making those decisions for them. 

The folks at Civitas, a British think tank devoted to the study of civil society, decided to do something about it.  They decided to demonstrate that they could run a private school for working people that delivered a basic education for about $5,000 per year, significantly less than the cost of a full-service private school.

On September 13, 2004, the first New Model School—“excellent and affordable private schools”—opened in a sports center in Queen’s Park in Northwest London.  It is starting with one teacher and one aide, and is accepting 4-5 year olds in its “reception year.”  The schools will use the “direct instruction” method that has achieved significant success in the United States (click here for more info).  Parents at the New Model School are expected to volunteer and “to foster attitudes of respect and courtesy in their children.”  The cost is 900 UK pounds per term.

The New Model School is opening in Queen’s Park in response to interest expressed by local parents.  It is intended, of course, as a template, a model that can be applied by interested parents anywhere in Britain.  The New Model School concept is ready to be expanded into a chain of local schools, starting like the Queen’s Park unit in a sports or church facility and only moving to permanent buildings after demonstrating viability.

This modest educational startup has attracted some notice.  The World Socialist complained that by opening the Queen’s Park school in a racially mixed area “Civitas was playing on middle-class fears of the racial mix in local schools.”  But it took heart that “most people view organisations such as Civitas with extreme suspicion.”  Fortunately only 10 children had enrolled with a week to go before school opened.  Of course the real problem was that, by “grossly underfunding” its schools the British government had created a climate in which right-wing think tanks could thrive and pursue their “reactionary agenda.”

The Guardian reported on the school opening, and quoted “former immigration minister” Barbara Roche, who had received a fundraising letter from Civitas that “alarmed” her.  She wondered if schools were now “going to be established that will attack our multiracial, multicultural society.”

Only Sarah Harris at The Daily Mail managed to report the opening without ideological bias, discussing New Model School’s fees in as the educational equivalent of budget airlines and hotels, a low-cost alternative to elite schools like Eton, Harrow, and Winchester that charge 20,000 pounds per year, and the mid-range chain of schools being developed by Global Education Management Systems (Gems) that aims to deliver an education at 10,000 pounds per year.

It’s a novel concept for the modern parent—paying for your child’s education.  In the old days, of course, parents made harrowing sacrifices to get their children a basic grounding in literacy and numeracy.  James Mill, father of John Stuart Mill, observed in the early nineteenth century that parents subsisted on potatoes so they could scrape up the cash to pay their children’s school fees.  And Jacob Riis at the end of the nineteenth century noted that in New York the only reason that immigrant parents did not send their children to school was when they needed the child’s wages to eat.

Yet in our modern era governments assume that parents have to be enticed with “free” schools and flogged with compulsory education laws to deliver their children up to the advantage of education. 

Still, the lefties are right to rail against the New Model School startup.  Children that learn to love books and develop an attitude of respect and courtesy aren’t going to turn into the kind of people that the left knows and loves:  helpless victims or transgressive activists.  Instead they might turn into law-abiding purposeful adults, capable of self-government, the Anglosphere’s gift to the world.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS

Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois

Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990

Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing

Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit

Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008

presented by Christopher Chantrill

 •  Contact