home  |  book  |

Lee Harris: We Want More Middle Class Family Values

print view

Us Against the Gangs

by Christopher Chantrill
March 14, 2004 at 3:00 am

|

THE GREAT PROBLEM of the Anglosphere is that its ideas are three hundred years old.  This means that the culture of democratic capitalism that dominates the world like a colossus is founded on ideas that groan with the load imposed upon them. 

For the young and the restless, three hundred year-old ideas aren’t good enough.  It is all very well for Russell Kirk to insist on the permanent things in The Conservative Mind, but what jewels does he offer to distract the young from the brilliant facets of Marx, Freud, and Foucault?  Nothing.

In fact, The Conservative Mind does not engage at all with the moderns.  It dismisses Rousseau, Hegel, Marx, and Freud as cranks and imposters.  And Kant doesn’t even rate a mention. 

This is madness.  Whatever their faults, the giants of the continental tradition spawned a vast intellectual tradition that nearly engulfed the Anglosphere.  It cannot be explained away or brushed off.  Where it is right, it should be improved.  Where it is wrong, it should be challenged. 

But things are changing.  After a century in which German psychology seemed to point like an arrow into the heart of middle-class culture, we now have the developmental psychology of Clare Graves and his disciples that confronts the continental psychology of Freud, Piaget, and Erikson and trumps it.  It shows that the rule-and-role culture of the middle class is not expendable or even replaceable, and that the lefty dream of creative universal community is doomed to failure unless it is founded on the middle-class virtues.

In the writings of English professor Frederick Turner we have a solution to the modernist and postmodern cultural death spiral.  His Culture of Hope and Shakespeare’s Twenty-first Century Economics inaugurate the beginnings of a new tradition that takes the culture of challenge and transcends it with a culture of exaltation.

In the writings of Ken Wilber we can see a revival of the effort—begun nearly two hundred years ago by Schopenhauer—to effect a meeting of east and west in philosophy and spiritual understanding and practice.

With Civilization and Its Enemies, Lee Harris begins another heroic effort.  He begins to take sociology back from the Marxists.  Using his knowledge of Hegel, he builds a new sociology of the west, demonstrating that its power derives from crucial developments in social organization. 

First of all he calls attention to the transformation of the teenage boys’ gang into the team.  It allowed the Greeks to scale back the power of the family and allow people to extend the bounds of trust beyond blood relationships.  The power of the team was first exhibited in the hoplite heavy infantry of the Spartans, then in the Roman concept of patria, and latterly in the invention of the nation state.  Today we see it manifest in the stunning power of modern corporations and the American army in the Middle East.

But there’s more.  Harris interprets the Protestant Reformation as the discovery of self-government by the burghers of North Germany.  The city economy demands more than grudging obedience to the law.  Its success demands self-control and the performance of promises from its merchants and artisans.  Thus was born the “respectable” businessman, modern professionalism and the Protestant conscience.  “It is an error to ask whether Protestantism caused capitalism, as Weber argued, or capitalism Protestantism, as Marx argued.”  The two go together, and reinforce each other.  And they have changed the world.

But our culture of self-government faces a problem.  What do we do about people who do not join the culture and obey the rules of the team and self-governing bourgeoisism?  What do we do, in fact, about “the eternal gang of ruthless men?”  “Someone must be prepared to fight them whenever they threaten to enter into history.”  Like Al Qaeda does right now.

The problem is, of course, to whom do we give the power to deal ruthlessly with the ruthless men?  And how do we prevent them from becoming a mirror of the gang of ruthless men we have mobilized them to defeat, new Napoleons interested only in their own glory.

The answer is, of course, Us.  The United States is uniquely qualified to gang up on the gangs because, beyond any society in the world, it has internalized the code of honor begun by the North German bourgeoisie of 1500.  It wants only to live in a world of commercial trust and reciprocity.

If only the intellectuals of America and Europe would grasp this, and stop following their bliss to “abstract utopias and fantasy ideologies and return to the real world.” 

Harris’s Civilization and Its Enemies contains three or four ideas of the first rank, and represents another building in the new city on a hill that we are building to transcend the utopian visions of the continentals.  One day this new construction will appear on the radar of the liberal intellectual establishment.  But then it will be too late.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS

Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois

Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990

Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing

Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit

Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008

presented by Christopher Chantrill

 •  Contact